The page where your author answers (or creatively evades) all your questions about the story’s resident ‘Mons.
Q. How long have the Beings been in existence?
A. Some estimates put their origin at approximately three thousand years ago. Other estimates think these first estimates are nonsense, and cast aspersions on the ponderosity of the estimators’ mothers.
Q. How has the presence of the Beings in human history made this world different from ours?
A. Not much at all.
Think of it this way: Imagine an alternate universe exactly the same as ours, but with no such thing as dog shows. How different would its history be? Probably not at all, except for the absence of certain specialty breeds of dogs.
Q. Do Beings have technological or scientific knowledge different from us? Or do they learn what we’ve learned?
A. They learn what we’ve learned — if that. Most Beings are pretty technologically inept, frankly. And they’re useless at creating new things on their own.
Q. Are Beings considered animals under the law or something else? Even in human form?
A. There aren’t any legal precedents for dealing with Beings; nobody’s ever brought a case involving them, as any such conflict would get resolved between their masters. For a fun evening, get a group of half a dozen freshman law students together, wait a few drinks, then ask what how moral they think that is.
Q. Would falling in love with a Being under your control be taboo? Is it against the law (per bestiality)?
A. Again, there’s no law about it. Whether it’s moral, or indeed reasonable, depends on who you ask.
Q. Does Rick Santorum lead rallies against Human-Being marriage, saying “I told you so!” and referencing the gay marriage issue?
A. Alas, Mr. Santorum has bigger fish to fry.
Q. Patrick has indicated that the First Law of Robotics (can’t hurt humans directly or allow them to come to harm) applies to Beings. It is the whole thing or just the first half?
A. Just the first half. Whether they allow any human other than their master to come to harm is up to their individual discretion.
Q. Since Beings can blow up buildings and damage property, can they (knowingly or unknowingly) hurt a human through environmental damage even if they can’t hit a person straight on?
A. In some cases, yes.
Q. What religion do Beings hold? The same as humans or something different?
A. Only they know. Although if you asked it in those words, they probably wouldn’t understand the question.
Q. Is every Being a different species of animal, like the Aces of Pandect? Or can there be two or more Beings that use the same animal form?
A. There are so few Beings in the first place that there’s no need for duplication.
Q. How many Beings are there at any one time on average? Has the number of Beings increased over the millennia or has it remained constant?
A. The nature of Beings’ lives and memories means that nobody has an exact count.
Q. Do Beings grow old and die of natural causes? If so, what is their expected life span? Or are they more like elves? Can Beings die from traumatic injury or will they heal from anything like Jack Harkness?
A. There are very few things that can destroy a Being. Unless one of those happens, they will continue existing.
Q. Do you get a Holy Grail if you win the game the Beings play?
A. The Game has no known concept of “winning.”
Q. Are there any notable historical figures who had their own Beings?
A. Oh, probably.
Q. What supernatural tales were inspired by the existence of Beings? Walking on water? Moving mountains?
A. Several popular anime.
Q. Does having a master make a Being stronger or weaker in terms of special abilities? Intellect? Personality?
A. Depends on the master.
Q. Evangelion’s Angels ate from the Tree of Life, thus going on different evolutionary pathways than humans despite a common ancestor. Mushi are the first stage of life that emerge from the River of Light, predating even bacteria. How do Beings fit into the overall ecological structure of the planet? Are they part of the normal organism kingdom system we use? Or, like the Angels and Mushi, do they represent something that exists outside our understanding of how life emerges and evolves?
A. Well, now, that would be telling.
Q. Does the military use Beings, and if so, in what capacity?
A. Some have tried. However, for various reasons it’s not a convenient strategy.
Q. Can Beings and humans interbreed?
A. No. (Aww, the comic just got its first WMG Jossed! They grow up so fast ;_;)
Q. Do scientists experiment on Beings?
A. Only the ones with nothing better to do.
Q. Are Beings categorized as weapons or as biological materials?
A. Depends on who you ask. For a lot of purposes they’re simply treated as pets.
Q. Can Beings be bought and sold legally, or is there a black market?
A. Any dealing with the ownership of Beings is complicated by the fact that once they contract with a human, that contract normally stays in place until the human dies.
Q. Are there conspiracies about or involving Beings?
Q. What is a Being’s real form?
A. Any form they take is, for that moment, as “real” as they get.
Q. Are there rogue Beings?
A. Patrick might have been considered “rogue” at the beginning of the story, although that stopped when he contracted with Bianca.
Q. Can a Being kill animals?
A. If their master ordered them to. Any consequences would then be treated as the master’s responsibility.
Q. Do governments regulate Beings like alcohol or drugs?
A. Lol, now I’m trying to imagine someone getting drunk on Patrick.
Q. If Sparrow and Bianca wanted to travel overseas with Patrick in tow, would there be any regulatory complications beyond the normal “bringing a pet along” variety?
A. Some airlines will insist that Beings pay full ticket price, even if they have a small animal form and stay in that for the entire flight. They claim it’s about dignity and respect, but let’s be serious here, we all know it’s about profit.
Q. Are there devices that can tell the difference between a Being and a normal animal/human?
A. If you really want to know, there are a couple of pretty simple tests you can run, no special equipment required.
Q. Can human weapons kill a being? (And by human, I mean anything from a .22 pistol to a cruise missile)
Q. If Patrick thinks Sparrow smells nice, how does he think Bianca smells?
Before she makes the contract: Human. After she makes the contract: Interesting.
Q. Does the gender mean something for Beings? Are they male, female, or something else?
A. Wait until you see how Patrick reacts to the drag show; that should give you some clues.
Q. Can Beings breed with animals?
Q. Do dog-like Beings dislike cat-like Beings? Do cat-like Beings eat mouse-like Beings?
A. The ways in which Beings interact are at once more complicated and more simple than that.
Q. Are Paris Hilton’s dogs Beings? Is Jim Carrey a Being???
A. Who knows? Although I have my suspicions about the Queen Mum’s corgis.
Q. Can Beings have personal feelings and opinions, or have them the same than their master?
A. Beings have their own personalities, complete with plenty of emotions and preferences. However, the desire to please their Masters overrides most others.
Q. Do they speak a secret language, that only other Beings understand?
A. Technically? No.
Q. Can a Master prostitute their Being? (Is it legal? Is it morally wrong in this society, or not wrong, because Beings are not human?)
A. It’s not illegal. How immoral the idea is depends on who you ask.
Q. What happens if a person eats all of or part of a Being’s animal form? What if it’s their Master? I’m curious about the nutritional value, taste, permanence of the flesh after its cut off, etc.
A. Whether or not it’s their Master trying to do the eating, they’d probably spit it right back out. Beings don’t taste very good. The cut-off parts don’t evaporate after, if that’s what you’re asking.
Q. What is a being’s chemical make-up? Is it made of energy? Do any earthly materials harm them, like how silver harms werewolves?
A. One part potassium, one part sodium, six parts iron, ten parts oxygen, two parts hydrogen…no, seriously, I have no idea. If they have a specific chemical Kryptonite, it hasn’t been discovered yet.
Q. What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen Being?
A. Twelve to fifteen miles per hour.
Q. We know there are ~100 Beings. If one dies, does a new one come into existence to take the place of the dead one?
Q. Beings don’t taste very good, but we know Beings have no sense of taste. So what happens when one Being eats another? Do they gain powers? Get a stomach ache?
A. They don’t eat each other.
Q. Will we get to meet Patrick’s former master?
A. I wouldn’t leave him out for the world.
Q. Do most people think Beings can harm humans?
A. Although their specific limits aren’t widely known, most people think of Beings as nothing to be afraid of.
Q. You’ve already mentioned beings are killable. What kind of Nazi insanity did it take to find out you could actually finish a being for good?
A. Buckets of it. Plus a singleminded determination to the goal, which involves a serious lack of empathy.
Q. What is the purpose of the game? Where was it first played? Why the emphasis on intensely public battles using such powerful creatures?
A. That last one is kind of like asking “why the emphasis on the Frisbee?” in a game of Frisbee. For as long as they’ve existed, Beings have been fighting each other. At some point somebody started calling it the Game, and the name stuck, to be passed down through the ages.
Q. Can Beings turn into anything or do they have a set thing? Or is it like, they have a set thing that’s simple to turn into but they can learn more its just really difficult?
A. Each Being has a basic animal form, and can turn into variations on that form. For instance, Cybele’s appearance as a giant pink rabbit is a variation on her basic appearance as a normal-sized (but still pink) rabbit.
Q. What efforts have scientists with morals made in studying Beings and their abilities?
Some, though not many. A few examples:
Attempts to document patterns in their behavior. These haven’t made much progress as every Being is different…and even with one individual, their habits tend to change radically when they switch Masters.
Measurements of height, weight, mass, strength, and other qualities while they change shape. They have upper limits on size, but how they change mass in the first place hasn’t been figured out.
Genetic testing. No matter what shape they’re in when the sample is taken, Beings’ DNA tests as “related to, but not quite, human.”
Q. How is art influenced by beings? Are they a theme in art at all? Is there a significant amount of literature featuring beings? What about TV shows, comics, movies and so on?
A. They’re not a world-changing theme, but of course Beings have appeared in or inspired various pieces of art over the years. A couple of anime. Some medieval iconography. A handful of silent films. One of the character selections in Street Fighter II. Loads of hard-to-regulate and morally-questionable pornography.
Q. Beings and pronouns! Do Beings care what pronouns are used to address them? I’m also curious what pronouns they use amongst themselves. Obviously they have a way to tell each other apart, but do things like sex and gender exist among them?
A. Having lived through plenty of languages with a variety of pronoun systems, Beings will pretty much go with whatever the people around them use. Their shapeshifting extends to everything, so whatever biological sex characteristics they have at any given time aren’t permanent.
Q. What’s the general distribution of Beings across the continents? Are there some regions with more of them than others?
A. There were none in Australia or the Americas until European settlers started bringing them. Because of their ties to human Masters, they tend to end up in areas of high population density.
Q. Can Beings be hurt by cold or heat? For example, if you were to put a Being in human form naked on the ice fields of Antarctica, would they freeze to death or shrug it off?
A. Shrug it off.
Q. How many Beings currently work in the pr0n industry? Given their shape shifting abilities, are they actively sought out by studio execs in the US and Japan?
A. Quite a few. They’ve been sought out for the purpose ever since cheap recorded sex became technologically feasible.
Q. Do Beings have a nervous system as we would understand it? A way to transmit thoughts through their body and into their limbs? If not, do we know how they gather sensory input? Do Beings have internal organs by default?
A. Beings appear to have the normal nerves and internal organs for whatever animal (including human) they are at the time. However, they don’t appear to be affected by damage that would disable a normal animal’s senses.
Q. Since we know Beings can shape shift, does this include inanimate forms, such as metal? Can a Being shift into a form that could then be attached to machinery?
A. Their forms always approximate that of an existing creature, although you could certainly wire yours up in various ways if you chose.
Q. So by approximate, you mean they have to resemble it fully? No partial representations allowed? So a chimera would be out, then?
A.They do have partial representations while they’re shapeshifting. It’s just not something they can maintain.
Q. An asteroid hits the planet and wipes out a large chunk of life on Earth. How devastating would the asteroid have to be before Beings died from that?
A. An asteroid big enough to take out a large chunk of humanity would probably take out some Beings as well.
Q. Can Beings reproduce at all, and if so, how?
A. The method by which new Beings come into existence is currently unknown.
Q. If a Being breaks a law, who is legally responsible?
A. Its Master.
Q. Forget the legalities of ownership — aren’t there any laws relating to the Game itself?!
A. What Beings do to each other is seen as their own business. Governments tend not to intervene.
Q. What do Beings get out of the Game that makes them so willing to duke it out rather than live in peace?
A. Beings are perfectly willing to live in peace when that’s what their Masters order. However, the Game is the only thing that comes close to “following my Master’s orders” as something a Being has any intrinsic desire to do.
Q. If they can read/write in “the language of the contract”, maybe a studious Being has kept a log of the early days?
A. Maybe! Although if something like that exists, its whereabouts aren’t known to any of the humans doing serious research on the topic.
Q. I’m allergic to cats, so would I be allergic to a cat Being?
A. Nope, you wouldn’t be allergic. Not unless you also had some kind of Being allergy.
Q. Is it possible to genetically alter yourself to become a Being? Have crazy scientist people ever attempted to do so?
A. I’m sure someone’s tried it, but never successfully. Patrick has said the difference isn’t genetic, but something more insubstantial (the presence of free will, perhaps?), which is pretty hard to alter with science.
Q. If you ordered your Being to accompany your kids on their year abroad as bodyguard and tour guide, would it be painful/dangerous for hir? Being away from Master, I mean.
A. If they were out of contact for extended periods of time, the Being would start to feel some emotional distress. How much depends on the temperament of the Being, and what kind of relationship they and their Master have.
Q. What are the limits of their mystical abilities outside that garden battle zone? We’ve seen them shapeshift (which given the whole cast and injuries in different forms has a stored body vibe to it) and heal but not much else. Basically can they do any other magic? Or even use their energy attacks outside the battlezone?
It’s complicated because Beings don’t think of those as mystical “abilities.” If anything, they’re limits — humans are the impressive ones, able to stay in one consistent body all their lives! The energy attacks are specifically designed for each other, and can’t be used on just anything.
Q. Is color a locked attribute as well as species – like, is Cybele stuck always being pink? We’ve seen Poe do a lot of serious shapechanging, especially within human range, but always with purple eyes, and Patrick likes yellow, brown and green…
Beings’ sigils and energy attacks are always a consistent color, and they do lean toward related color schemes.
That said, they aren’t required to have 100% consistency in any features — that’s in the comic as a visual aid to readers. When Poe completely disguises as someone, for instance, he doesn’t have distinctive purple eyes in-universe that could give him away to other characters. They’re just drawn that way so you can recognize and connect with each new form more quickly.
Q. Something I’m curious about is how far Beings’ selective honesty extends. Like, I know one can’t say “I’m Jason” or “my name is Jason”, for example, but could ze say “this is Susan, and her name is Jessica” if ze was talking about other Beings? Would it have to be “call me Jason. she goes by Susan, and she’s known as Jessica”? That would get suspicious…
A. If they were trying to be undercover, it would be telling, all right. But they’d be stuck needing to figure out a way to compensate for it. Names are meaningful, powerful things, and Beings are exquisitely sensitive to that — it’s not a trait you can work around without fundamentally changing who/what they are.
Q. I love how their sigils have similar elements, but are completely different. Do you have a method of creating them and deciding what motifs they have, or is it just whatever looks good?
A. All the sigils start with the same base, and then get lines and shapes added based largely on what looks good. (And/or on what shapes in the Paint Shop Pro library I haven’t used much yet. I may have to come up with almost 100 of these by series’ end, and they all need to be passably distinct.) Some of them were built around a loose theme, inspired by their personality or their animal form — Cybele’s has hearts, the Tiger’s has stripes.
In-universe, they’re supposed to be reminiscent of the sigils used for “magic”, but not exactly the same. (Especially since I think some of the “magic” ones look kind of dumb, heh.)
Q. Is there any substance a Being cannot stand? That is, is there something that Beings cannot stand to be near?
A. Nope, there is no Being Kryptonite.
Q. Would it be out of the question for a Being to ‘groom’ a future Master when their master declines due to old age or disease, or is it more whomever was handy?
A. In the event of an unplanned-for death, a Being might gravitate towards someone they were already familiar with (as Reseda did with Timothy), but they wouldn’t deliberately plan it beforehand.
What does happen is that existing Masters will plan for and groom their successors. That’s essentially what Jany’s grandmother did for Jany, and it’s probably what the Tiger’s previous Master would have done if Walker hadn’t volunteered herself as ready for the job, no guidance necessary.
Q. Kara Lynn had standing orders from when she was serving Jany’s grandmother, but how strict are those orders? Could a Master order (and have the order fulfilled) a Being to never get a new Master, even after the existing Master’s death?
A. Kara Lynn followed her previous Master’s orders because Jany renewed them (saying “Just keep doing all the things to help my family that you were doing before” without getting all the details). A Being whose Master just died might still go through the motions of following some old orders out of habit…but they’re going to be drawn to finding a new Master no matter what.
Q. Is that “name” issue for Beings linked to the fact that they do not, and cannot have an identity, or that they cannot have a permanent identity?
A. Yes! If a Being had a permanent, settled identity, and a name to go with it, they would be able to say “My name is ___” just fine.
Q. ‘If a Being had a permanent, settled identity…’ That would seem to imply that it’s theoretically possible. Or am I reading too much into your answer?
A. Yes, it is theoretically possible. (Which doesn’t necessarily mean it’s humanly possible.)
Q. How is it that Beings are physically prevented from speaking in certain ways? I have in mind the rule that Beings cannot lie that they have a specific name. I mean, is it that they can’t think that way? They are emotionally compelled not to lie?
A. The lying isn’t the problem; we’ve seen Beings lie or be deceptive in a couple of situations, either on direct orders from their Master or just because they knew it was what their Master would want.
It’s names, specifically, that they have trouble with. Names, and words in general, have power; to apply a new name to something that didn’t have it already is an exercise of power that Beings aren’t able to do.
Q. Lizards are cold-blooded. Is Kara Lynn, in the lizard form, affected by environment temperature, e.g. is she slowed down by cold? And in general, how far do the biological characteristics of Beings’ animal forms resemble those of the corresponding animals? Say, since snakes are deaf, would a snake-Being in snake form be deaf too? (And would it still be able to receive orders from its Master without hearing them?)
A. In general, Beings have excellent and wide-ranging senses in any form. A snake-Being would have good hearing, Patrick in dog form still has sensitive color vision, and so on.
So Kara Lynn isn’t physically slowed down by cold, but she doesn’t like it. And she’s drawn to heat sources more than the average warm-blooded-species Being.
Q. Can a Being Contract to another Being?
A. No. Nor can they be contracted to animals. (For the record, there aren’t any sapient extraterrestrials in this universe.) It only works with humans.
Q. I wondered if beings ever get jealous of their masters, either if they’re paying attention to other beings or other people. Probably is different from being to being, but I know that their emotions aren’t quite human, so they might not at all.
A. Yes, Beings can get jealous. (That’s what’s going on in this strip with Patrick, for instance.) It varies from Being to Being, and it also depends a lot on how secure they are in their Master’s affections. The current version of Patrick has a hard time trusting in his importance to Bianca; a lot of the other Beings we’ve met are more secure.
Q. Could Beings use their animal identity as a name? With multiple languages you could even find a name that sounds halfway normal, for example, My name is Cat, my name is neko, my name is Kassi.
A. Afraid not. The limits are based on underlying meaning, so you can’t get around them with clever phrasing. A Being can say things like “I am the Cat,” but it’s just a characteristic like “I am a blonde” or “I am tall”, not an individual identity.
Q. How many distinct forms – as in, injuries won’t transfer between them – do Beings have?
A. Three distinct forms. Human, animal, and monster.
Q. Can the Cows be aurochs? Can Beings in general be extinct animals?
A. The Cows can’t become aurochs, even the one that was originally the Auroch. Once a species or subspecies goes extinct, a Being can no longer take on that form.
Q. Did someBeing inherit the Mouse’s animal form(s)?
A. Beings can’t “inherit” each other’s forms. They’re all individuals, not connected in that way. They’re not like Time Lords!
Q. What makes a name True, since Timothy was able to Contract as Camellia before, I think, he started using it regularly?
A. Your true name is the one you identify with, whether anybody else knows it or not. (Entering into a mystical Name-based contract locks it in, though, so the contract would still apply even if your name changed later on.)
Q. Is there any chance the master of the Being in captivity is dead? Would the Being know even if separated from its master that the contract had been broken by death?
A. If the Being’s most recent Master had died, it would have lost the emotional drive to get back to him, and would instead be driven to find someone new to Contract with. It would probably still have all those clear memories of him, but without the feeling of loving or missing him included.
Q. Names have power in their world, but what if a person (human) doesn’t have a name? It’s clear that they’re still capable of making a contract using a pseudonym (as with Timothy), but what if that human doesn’t have a name that they can identify themselves with? Would something like that make a contract somewhat difficult to make or at the very least make it easier for the Being to say their master’s name?
A. Anything you identify with can be your True Name. Camellia chose a name she’d decided on that nobody had ever actually called her, and it worked. Jany could conceivably have entered the Contract as Saturn39, the username she answers to online. If everyone addresses you by a certain nickname, that’s perfectly valid, even if it isn’t the name on your birth certificate or the one you sign your checks with.
Q. I know they don’t have a “kryptonite” (short of being away from their masters), but what exactly gives them strength? It’s clearly not just their physical limitations or the amount of practice they have. Is it their personal happiness (as measured, by how well they please their masters), or some other set thing?
A. It’s mostly from having a Master, being loved, following their Master’s commands, and fighting. Not necessarily in that order.
Q. Is “I, [your name here]” really the whole of the Contract, or are we-the-readers just not seeing the fine print?
A. Yes, there’s a lot more to the Contract. It’s a whole program, and humans who enter it are just filling their names into the “____ is the person you answer to” slot.
Q. If a Beings master shared a name with somebody, would they be able to say their name? So for example, if a Beings master is named “John Smith” (and this is the name they signed he contract with), if there was another person called called John Smith, would the Being be able to say their name? How would they refer to them?
A. The Being wouldn’t be able to say the other John Smith’s name either, and would have to come up with some kind of workaround. For instance, Patrick could refer to George Washington as “George” or “the first President” or “the guy on the one-dollar bill.” This gets awkward when your Master has a common word as part of their name, but you still have to work around it. Ann Walker’s Being could say “an assistive walking device” instead of “a walker;” Poe would have to use words like “a basin” or “a small sea” or “Huron/Erie/Superior/[other lake name]” if he needed to refer to a lake.
Q. If, as a master, you were to trade/exchange one Being for another (ignoring that this breaks Contracts), such that you are now the master of a different Being, and if you ignore the physical “preferences”/limitations of the specific Beings (ex what forms they can take), once the new Being got used to you/how you think, would you notice any difference in the behaviour of the new Being compared to the old one (assuming your needs/desires haven’t changed)?
A. Different Beings would turn out slightly different even with identical Masters and circumstances. They all have their own “base temperament,” related to their animal form — for instance, the Dog will tend to being more emotionally expressive than the Lizard.
To go with another computing-related analogy, imagine the Master’s desires are a program, and the Beings are different machines with slightly different specs — one might have more memory, another might have a better graphics card, and so on. The software will run a little differently on each because of the hardware differences.
Q. Is the beings short memory perhaps related to the lifespan of their masters? It seems like changing one’s personality and desires every few decades would be detrimental to one’s memory.
A. Exactly right.
Beings don’t have infinite memory, any more than they have infinite…anything-else. They have the best their creators could give them, but it’s limited.
When a Being gets a new Master, their views and emotions change to line up with what that Master wants — so they start losing their sense of feeling about the previous Master. (The current state of Patrick is an exception.) The old memories lose their sense of emotional connection, and, as a result, start to fade.
This usually happens long before they would be overloading their physical memory capacity. A Being who’s been with the same Master for 50 years will have no trouble remembering how they met, but a Being who has had 5 Masters in the same timespan will only remember the first one vaguely, if at all.
Fun fact: a Master could counteract this process, by ordering their Being, “Retain a clear memory of Thing X.” That would safeguard Thing X from the natural fading process, until the next Master came along. So a Being has the capacity to remember something for thousands of years!…if it has an unbroken line of Masters ordering it to hold on to the memory.
Q. Could a Being be irreparably damaged (in any way that affects their functionality) through multiple forced erasures of their masters’ names from their Contracts?
A. It would not be irreparably damaging…just hella traumatizing. The more traumatized they are, the harder it is for them to function, and the longer it takes to recover.
Q. Do Beings never have a breaking point, apart from not having a master?
A. You can reduce them to inanimate dirt by erasing the right (wrong?) part of the Contract.
Also: total physical obliteration, in ways that are very hard to confirm in-universe. If you drop a nuclear bomb on a Being, it’ll be destroyed, but you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between that and “much more damaged than usual, will take its time reconstituting and then pop up on this site 100 years from now.”
Q. Are Beings able to use being powers to teleport back to their Masters’ sides if they need them? If so, would a battle be required to accomplish it?
No, Beings can’t teleport, not even within the battle dimension.
Q. If I contract with a Being using my full name (i.e. “I, John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt…”), and a Being can use a shortened nickname of their Master’s but not their full name (i.e. “Bee” but not “Bianca”) then could my Being refer to me as “John” or “Jacob”?
A. The thing to remember about Contract functions is that they’re not specific and inflexible, computer-style. There’s not a simple rule like “as long as you say less than X% of the Master’s Name, it counts as a nickname.” It’s more like “if the Master honestly perceives something as a nickname, it counts as a nickname.”
Trying to wrangle a Being around a rule via sneaky technicalities isn’t going to work, because the Being (and/or the Contract) will recognize that you’re trying to pull a sneaky technicality, and respond accordingly. It’s like someone trying to be a dick on a forum — even if they’re not breaking any specific forum rules, a moderator can still make the intuition-based call of “this stops now on the grounds of you being a dick.”
Q. Can Beings really get [doll-size] when human? I assume they can’t, since you’ve only shown them shrinking in animal form, but it is an Important Question.
A. Sadly, no. They can get anywhere in the possible human size range, which is a really wide range once you get to the farthest outliers (record-setting Jyoti Amge is 23″ tall!), but they’re not going to be able to wear Barbie clothes.
Q. Could Patrick (who is taking classes for this) could be commanded to retain his memory of the English written language even into his next Contracts? Could his next Master order him to “remember how to read and write English”?
A. Yes! As discussed after chapter 19.
However, when it comes to reading and writing, Beings are inherently limited. They’re built on a Contract of written words, which instills a barrier to processing writing in any other language. And creating original words of their own…that’s about as inaccessible to them as having original opinions.
So even if every new Master immediately ordered Patrick to remember the learned skill, he wouldn’t make it to the level of a human.
Q. In revelation of Jany’s new exploration in to Things, what would happen if, say, she liked things the other way around? Could a Being strike its master if under a direct order and the Master liked that kind of pain? And even if it’s not a direct pain thing; BDSM has things like fireplay which aren’t necessarily painful, could a Being perform that if instructed?
A. Unfortunately for the masochists of the world, the Contract doesn’t have any exceptions to the “don’t hurt humans” clause. Ordering your Being to hit you would get the same reaction as ordering your Being to use your real name: stubborn refusal and/or panicky apologies, depending on that Being’s temperament and how secure it feels.
If something is intensely stimulating without being harmful, it’s okay — so a Being could inflict some temperature play. It just couldn’t do any of the fireplay that involves actually setting a person on fire. And if you gave it successively more dangerous orders, they would get harder and harder to follow as the Being’s inhibitions kicked in.
Q. I really want to know if Beings can be based on sea animals and/or insects/arthropoda. We’ve only really seen land animals, so…
A. There are several Beings based on sea creatures. Their creators weren’t able to study oceangoing creatures very well, so the types are usually vaguer — Kaguya, the Sea Monster, can be anything from an octopus to an eel to a crocodile.
No bugs. Their creators wouldn’t have wanted to make their own plagues.
Q. Does the Beings’ disadvantage in reading make it harder for them to read road signs? Not having original opinions doesn’t prevent them from saying original sentences. Is that worse in writing?
A. Road signs are designed to be as clear as possible for people with a wide range of abilities. You don’t need to know the word STOP to get the meaning of a big red octagon. What would give a Being trouble is a cross-country journey where you have to track a lot of individual street/city names.
Writing has a special level of power that speech doesn’t. That’s why all the magic requires you to write out the sigils, why each Contract is physically written down, and why Beings can talk but not write.
Q. What’s the difference between big red octagon and letter S? Would it be easier for being to learn hieroglyphs? Or is the multiple-letters-form-a-word part which is hard for them? Or are the signs also harder than for humans, but being easier in general makes them still easy enough to get the meaning?
A. The wild thing is, those symbols are processed differently by the human brain, and we still don’t have a full understanding of how or why. (The reason we know it at all is mostly from people who have strokes, or other accidents that damage part of the brain, and lose the ability to interpret written words — even though they can see shapes perfectly fine.)
Beings could learn that “drawing of a bird” means “bird” pretty easily. Any less literal meanings, especially sounds or abstract concepts, would be harder for them to wrap their heads around.
Q. If humans successfully bring back extinct species such as the Auroch, would the Being that was formerly the Auroch and is now cattle, go back to being an auroch?
A. Sadly, no. Selective breeding is great for trying to re-fill the archaeological niches we’ve emptied, but it’s creating a new breed, not bringing back the old one.
To get the Being formerly known as the Auroch to revert to its old form, you would need time travel. Or cloning a new auroch from preserved DNA, Jurassic Park style.